Buck v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 476 F.3d 29, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 2618

(Successful appeal to United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit dismissing the claims made by 4 plaintiffs accusing multiple airlines of unlawfully failing to refund various fees and taxes that had been collected as part of the original unused non-refundable ticket prices.  Dismissal was granted on the ground that the claims were preempted by the Airline Deregulation Act (ADA), former 49 U.S.C.S. Appx. § 1301 et seq.);

Ceruolo v. Garcia, 92 Mass. App. Ct. 185, 83 N.E.3d 179, 2017 Mass. App. LEXIS 119

(Successful Appeal to the Massachusetts Appeals Court wherein the court set aside a default judgment because the trial judge applied the incorrect standard applicable to a rule 55(c) motion to remove the entry of default, which is “good cause,” not the “excusable neglect” standard applied here.);

Blais v. R.I. Airport Corp., 212 A.3d 604, 2019 R.I. LEXIS 107, 2019 WL 2528580

(Successful appeal to Rhode Island Supreme Court challenging administrative order of R.I. Airport Corporation barring a pilot from accessing a public airport.);

Davis v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 882 A.2d 557, 2005 R.I. LEXIS 159

(Successful appeal to Rhode Island Supreme Court affirming judgment in favor of Ford Credit  based upon plaintiffs’ execution of the releases in favor of lessee, which barred their claim against Ford Credit as a matter of law pursuant to G.L. 1956 § 31-33-6 );

April Lima v. Town of Lincoln et al (United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island C.A. No. 1:10-cv-00524-ML-PAS) (Successful jury trial to verdict representing UTGR, Inc. d/b/a Twin River Casino and one of its security guards in an “excessive force” case asserting civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 & 1985.);

Fieldturf  USA, Inc. et al v. David W. White and Son, Inc. (United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts 08 CA 11214 MLW) (voluntary dismissal after filing early summary judgment motion in Patent Infringement case wherein plaintiff alleged defendant made an offer to sell plaintiff’s patented synthetic turf which conformed to the specifications in public bidding documents);

Brian K. Crum v. Ford Motor Credit Company et al (Providence Superior Court C.A. No. 99-4617) (successful jury trial to verdict representing Ford Motor Credit Company in catastrophic personal injury case with multi-million dollar exposure prosecuted under the now repealed vicarious liability laws of Rhode Island);

John Weld, Jr. et al v. CVS Pharmacy et al (Suffolk Superior Court C.A. No. 98-0897) (Successful defense of Adheris, Inc. f/k/a Elensys Care Services, Inc. in consumer class action alleging violation of state consumer protection laws and privacy statute as a result of the alleged unauthorized exchange of customers’ confidential medical data and demographic information maintained by CVS Pharmacy, Inc.);

Play Time, Inc. v. LDDS Communications, Inc. and Michael Eisemann (United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts C.A. No. 96-2066) (successful jury trial to verdict representing individual who retained ownership rights to unique and commercially valuable toll free 800 telephone number);

Richard Williams v. Richard Bihrle et al (Dukes County Superior Court C.A. Nos. 94-0081 cons. 95-0003) (successful jury trial to verdict of equipment retailer in product liability case involving a chainsaw sold by client to plaintiff who severed his arm while using the product.); and,

Reliant Airlines, Inc. et al v. County of Broome (United States District Court for the Northern District of New York C.A. No. 90-CV-537) (successful jury trial recovering seven figure judgment for property damage to Falcon 20 aircraft destroyed in runway overrun due to untreated ice on runway and incorrectly reported braking action advisories).